Over the years and the decades, the centuries and the millennia; the descendants of Loewenmensch and Hohle Fels lost connection with the world that had existed in the caves and in the huts built from mastodon bones. The people of that time had found ways to avoid conflict with other groups, live in relative harmony, and accept accumulating only what was necessary for survival.
But the later Mensch and the Hohle Fels families, and others, who lived in the amazingly transitional times of the late Neolithic and early Bronze Ages, and even Loewen, who became the iconic priest, Bes, participated in the inception of a system steeped in disparate social class, wealth accumulation, tribal conflict, and human bondage.
It is not surprising, despite communist ideals and given differences in the makeup of individuals, that hierarchical structures will be arranged when people begin to congregate and interrelate. It is only when people who govern decide that they are somehow different from, or unaccountable to, the others that unnecessary imbalance will occur.
Below is a visual record of individuals living around the populated world during the time of the late Neolithic and early Bronze periods.
We imagine there must have been a lot of grunting, nodding, and gesturing during the wedding ceremony, since there seems not yet to have been any kind of complex verbal language – nor did there seem to be, as well, any explicit communication system – no markings, no graphic signs, no pictographs, no alphabet with which they could commemorate the wedding.
But as the descendants of Mensch and Hohle Fels, and other families spread to the east – to Egypt and Mesopotamia, India and Pakistan, and west – to Britain, creating their farms and communities along the ways, complex communication became more important. And, surprise, the first 4,000 years of the development of written communication was not about personal interrelating but was all about commerce – keeping account of commercial transactions.
As demonstrated by the fact that I am still talking about this time, the Neolithic period (+/-9,000 to +/- 3,000BC) seems to have been one of the most densely productive times in human history. And one of the most astounding accomplishments within this approximately 6 to 8,000-year period was the evolution of a written and aural language that became increasingly more intricate and abstract. It developed almost concurrently, but independently, in China and in Mesoamerica, but the creation of complex language appears to have begun in Sumer, in the western part of what is now called Iran.
For millions of years hominid roamed the Earth, primarily Africa and its surrounds, with very basic (in comparison to our own) communication skills. Neither homo habilis, nor homo erectus, nor homo sapiens evolved their communication to any degree – until this Neolithic time. Then, suddenly, it all changed. Some say it happened in tandem with an increase of brain size and a corresponding development of the vocal tract. Others posit that the invention and use of tools drove a development of the brain that ultimately led to this improvement of language skills.
In his book, The Phenomenon of Man, Teilhard de Chardin discusses that, put simply, when humans coalesce, gather into larger and denser groups, an energy is created that propels humanity toward greater understanding and accomplishment – although he does hold off until the book’s appendix to raise the topic of the negative side of human evolution.
Credit to “The Evolution of Writing” by Denise Schmandt-Besserat for images and information.
None of the previously described processes was happening in isolation. Population had spread throughout the Earth, not just central Europe, Egypt, and Mesopotamia, but also cultures in eastern Asia had flourished throughout the Neolithic, beginning as far back as 18,000 BC. And civilizations in Mesoamerica were beginning to independently develop – the Olmec and the Maya.
Loewen as Bes
Back in northern Africa, Loewen was not content to confine himself to the animal kingdom. In Egypt he created another identity, Bes, who, with his consort Beset, fashioned themselves as Egyptian deities. They began their mission in Egypt and descended quickly south, into Nubia and Somalia. Their notoriety and following quickly spread to the middle East, into Syria, and then west as far as the Balearic Islands, primarily Ibiza. Oddly enough, the king and queen of the animal world were also idolized as the protectors of homes, families, and children.
Other ideas began to spread. Egypt’s concepts about architecture, and art, traveled north through Cyprus, Crete, Malta, into Turkey and Greece – and east to Mesopotamia. The Mesopotamians developed the earliest notions about writing – eventually more abstract than the pictographic markings of the Egyptians, they ultimately originated an alphabet – and the thinking of Gilgamesh and Hammurabi, relating to governance progressed westward after the 2nd and 1st millennia BC.
Which talk about the civilizing of society brings us to the subjects of ritual human sacrifice.
Burial Pit
Strongly related to the more benign sounding, but extraordinarily illusory, and to this day commonly accepted notion of personal religious sacrifice; ritual sacrifice, regularly practiced into the first millennium AD in Europe, Africa, and Asia; and in Mesoamerica until the invasion of the Spanish in the 1600s AD, was simply the taking of human life by other, more powerful humans, for purposeful, but practically unsubstantiated gain. People were buried alive, stabbed with pikes through their skulls, and poisoned, among many other creatively murderous methods, for purposes ranging from ensuring the longevity of a building, to justifying the waging of war, to establishing one’s hierarchical space in some hypothetically imagined afterlife
Why is this topic so important to inject – during the time when what we designate as culture was beginning to evolve in fascinating ways throughout the world? Because during my lifetime, not to mention all human history, there has rarely been a day without war – somewhere on this planet. And war, though sometimes defensively necessary, consists of the taking of lives. It is related to our, human, attitude about the value of life – someone else’s life. And that perspective is an intrinsic piece of the construct that is characterized as civilization.
What happened after Loewenmensch’s transition? In a sense he was suddenly gone! Hohle Fels was confused about her connection to whom she had married: The Loewen? The Mensch?
After the Transition
It is difficult to know for sure what exactly occurred during that densely transitional time between the wedding and, perhaps, around 3,000 BC. Authorities and experts disagree, but it feels like Hohle Fels ultimately went inside – inside herself, and inside the family compound with Mensch – by his side in his role as her king; and amid the work being accomplished at home.
Pharoah
At first, as her immediate world became dense, with the populations of settlements increasing, she worked as a co-equal partner with Mensch in the process of developing their estate, but time separated their roles, as the administering of State and religion diverged from the maintenance of home. She might have divined a sense of this future had she closely read the laws of her wedding officiant, Hammurabi.
Hohle Fels at Home
We may also never know the purpose for which those first likenesses, of the women of the wedding party, were created. But now, in this end of Neolithic time, we, and maybe Hohle Fels as well, miss the perception of ebullience that we enjoyed when we first saw them. In the later stages of the Neolithic she rarely appears as a visible or equal consultant about administrative operations. The images we see of her and her descendants seem to convey the notion that she ultimately became circumscribed within her dual abstract roles in the quasi-human domain; goddess of desires and crops, and caretaker of her personal domicile. Roles that have continued almost consistently until this day.
At a certain point, around the time of the conversion from matriarchies to patriarchies, roughly around 3000 BC, Loewenmensch, recognizing the complexities of the evolving world, decided to cleave his (their) dual personalities and separate into Loewen (lion) and Mensch (human). He (They) trekked to his (their) familiar ritual spot, beneath the dense trees and cool filtered light of the Black Forest, quiet and secluded, and began his (their) transformation.
Morphosis
Inaudibly, they transitioned through their separate identities, their original selves disappearing into the inaccessible past; morphing through various forms until settling on manifestations appropriate to their evolutionary time. Lion preemptively assumed his role as king of the animal realm, and Mensch appropriated his position as king of the human world.
Lion decided the animal world would remain as hunter/gatherers. Their society became a system of natural struggle and contest. It derived its hierarchies through battle, with Lion as king, through its differences in personal traits, tactics, and physical ability.
The human world, ruled by Mensch, ultimately emerged as a system of property and possession. As societies became denser, a system of artificial order and regulations was developed that governed the behavior of individuals, not only to influence the conduct among human relationships, but also to preserve the logistical systems, related to property, that had been set in place. These systems eventually came to be protected by groups of enforcers that were created and organized by Mensch and later rulers. Initially selected by the populace, the order of rule later became familial, passing from son to son (and sometimes daughter), until such times when factions of greater strength overwhelmed the rule in place.
One of the curious aspects for me, about the span of the 12,000 years of the Neolithic period, the beginning of the warming of the Earth, was the transfer of power from matriarchies to male dominated societies. As you can see, almost all the guests at the Loewenmensch-Hohle Fels wedding were women. These are women who had been immortalized in clay and stone over tens of thousands of years. They were representative at the beginnings of settlements in the river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates, the Nile valley, the Indus Valley, lower Turkey, and France and Germany.
The Wedding Guests
There is very little we know about the images of these women, and particularly about who it was that created these images or what was their motive. Another thing we don’t know about is the power relationship between men and women during that early time. Most societies appeared to be matriarchal, but when the hunter-gatherers began to accumulate into settlements, then into villages and small cities, the image of the male as the dominant gender, in terms of leadership in the society, began to emerge. We do know that there is little to no image record of men in society from about 35,000 BC until, perhaps, around 3,000 BC, except for the painted hand prints that you see on many of the cave walls in France and Germany and Indonesia. But these first images, beginning in the third millennium BC, did generally represent men in power positions.
The New Leaders ca 2,600 BC
Some speculate that the aggressive tendencies of men, which had previously been spent on the hunting grounds, began to manifest themselves within the leadership structure of the new communities. These men became known as kings, and pharaohs, and priests, and shaman, and emerged throughout the world, not only in Europe and Africa and middle Asia, but also in eastern Asia and meso-America; ultimately reducing the number of matrilineal societies to about 20% of all cultures.
The Transfer
This shift in power I have been discussing, based theoretically on the supposed innate male traits of assertiveness and aggression, recalls one of my favorite images. It is the one image on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, where Michelangelo (allegedly) places Eve, within the somewhat possessive and protective crook of god’s arm, and god, sporting his familiar stern visage, points at a somewhat docile and lethargic Adam as if challenging or daring him to arise and take Eve.
The difference between a tool and a weapon is intention.
Very roughly, about 3 to 4 million years ago, tools were created. Over time these tools began to be honed and made more efficient to better fit the various purposes for which they were intended: hunting, foraging, cave-crafting. But it took, again very roughly, 2.5 to 3.5 million of those years, until 400,000 years ago, to arrive at the idea of being able to convert or re-craft those elementary tools into forms that could be specifically identified as objects intended as weaponry.
4,000,000 BC
Still, until the end of the Ice Age (with some exceptions), approximately 12,000 years ago, people seem to have generally found ways to exist in relative harmony. It wasn’t until, because of the warming Earth (although other reasons are also being put forward), people began to preference agriculture over hunting, and to establish various forms of settlement: to gather into townships, and tribes, and colonies. It was at this time, subsequent to the reign of the mother-goddess, and within the time frames of the Egyptian Loewenmenschen, that mass confrontation began in earnest.
At this late time, weapons began to become increasingly more efficient at taking the lives of animals and people. For 3 to 4 million years weapons had very slowly become more efficient for their purposes, but after that time of 3 to 4 million years, it took only another 12,000 or so, relatively a moment, to escalate these rough tools and crude weapons into mechanisms that are capable of enormous destruction and mass annihilation.
Today
Coincidentally, this is the era to which the term: “beginnings of civil(ization),” begins to be applied.
There is what we, at this present time in history, consider a dark aspect of the human psyche that, even now, seems to have little difficulty being able to justify the purposeful ending, or taking, of another life, or other lives. It has always been thus. But it is possible that the onset of accumulation in the new settlements: the storing of foodstuffs and other perishables, and the ensuing creation of economic imbalance and difference, rather than nourishing an inclination to share, might have intensified our inherent propensity toward, among other things, personal desire, selfishness and greed.
Meanwhile the mother-goddess returned home to Turkey, to Göbekli Tepe. It was almost as if she had said, “Enough of the caves and the crude huts made from the bones of deceased mammoths. Get me a Pritzker architect and build me a proper edifice!” And in that time, around 10,000 BC, almost 12,000 years ago, slightly before the beginnings of the accumulation of peoples around Jericho, and other Palestinian locations, and 7,000 years before the first of the Egyptian pyramids; she built a massive structure of tall shaped columns and large open spaces.
She sat alone in her throne, except for the foxes perennially at her sides, amid her developing creation, and pondered the difference between this immense building and the environments of the people with whom she had just been celebrating in lower Germany, her friends Hohle Fels and Loewenmensch.
There are questions about the primary purpose of her creation. It was obviously a religious ground, but some suggest even more, a skull worship – an homage to death – as there have been found skulls and other skeleton parts encased within the columns and other elements of the structure.
I want to take a moment to skip ahead several thousand years, only temporarily, just to make a point about the spread of culture, and its impact on civilization.
It appears that in the 2nd to 3rd millennia BC, the Loewenmensch-Hohle Fels family continued to have prominent visibility and wielded immense leverage in places of power, particularly, at this point, in the royal halls of Egypt. These cousins, direct descendants of Loewenmensch and Venus: Loewenmensch (known as Sphinx of Giza), Loewenmensch (Sphinx of Senrusret III, and Loewenmensch.Hohle Fels, attained near-divine stature in Egypt during this time.
Of course, there were kings, and emperors, and pharaohs who exerted pragmatic control over the populace – even priests who seconded these rulers and ran fiefdoms of their own. But, as the above family portrait shows, there are families who continue through time, like the Capetians, the Kahns, and the Rothschilds in different eras, who, behind the scenes, have had, and continue to have, significant impact and influence on the trajectories of civilizations.
The Ever-unfolding Marriage of Loewenmensch and Venus of Hohle Fels
Over the next 20,000 years the descendants of Leowenmensch and Venus, seeing off the last of their Neanderthal friends, and the ending of the Ice Age, expanded west and east, conjoining with other groups in the fertile valleys of Europe and along the flowing rivers of the middle East, as well as in northern Africa.
They lived, sometimes, in huts made from the bones of the carcasses of the mammoths, their early brethren, who were also becoming extinct due to the extreme change in climate. The women shared coequally with the men in accomplishing the food gathering and preparation, if maybe not the child rearing; and the families did not reside as individual units, but coexisted in groups, giving question to the assumed timing and the previously accepted application of the designation, civil(ization).
They did not war, as had occurred hundreds of thousands of years before, as there was plenty; though there became signs of the beginnings of individual accumulation and, perhaps, greed.
